http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/02/cut-the-fees/ Just another WordPress.com weblog Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:27:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/02/cut-the-fees/#comment-122 Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:13:27 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=155#comment-122 Shows businesses are committed to using the channel. If there was no fee, these comparison engines would be wasting alot of time with merchants who are not concerned about quality. If the fee is too much, it probably means that the merchant is not of a size to handle a real user base that may be driven over by the increased traffic that the CE deliver.

]]> http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/02/cut-the-fees/#comment-121 Sun, 09 Oct 2005 22:20:25 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=155#comment-121 [...] k ago I wrote about the start up fees of some of the shopping comparison engines. In that post, I stated that Shopping.com’s (SDC) minimum initial deposit (which goes towards clicks – there [...]

]]> http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/02/cut-the-fees/#comment-120 Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:31:32 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=155#comment-120 I couldn’t agree more – it is extremely short-sighted of the comparison engines to nickel and dime small businesses when they are first setting up their account. If they really have faith in their product they should be giving away free advertising (like Pricewatch does for 1 month) to get advertisers hooked. The real money comes when the channel has been proven and the marketer can open up their wallet.

]]>