<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holiday Shopping at Yahoo! Shopping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/30/holiday-shopping-at-yahoo-shopping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/30/holiday-shopping-at-yahoo-shopping/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/30/holiday-shopping-at-yahoo-shopping/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=182#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;query classification&quot; push makes no sense to me.  If a lot of effort is spent trying to turn search into browse, perhaps browse would be better served in the first place.  Yahoo has been trying to force search since the launch of Froogle.  Search is great for tail products, but for general queries it&#039;s always going to get back into a browse functionality, since that&#039;s how people actually shop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;query classification&#8221; push makes no sense to me.  If a lot of effort is spent trying to turn search into browse, perhaps browse would be better served in the first place.  Yahoo has been trying to force search since the launch of Froogle.  Search is great for tail products, but for general queries it&#8217;s always going to get back into a browse functionality, since that&#8217;s how people actually shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franck - Sight'Up</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/10/30/holiday-shopping-at-yahoo-shopping/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franck - Sight'Up]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=182#comment-169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For information, Yahoo!  Shopping already uses our technology of attribute extraction for all its European Sites.

Through Kelkoo (Yahoo!  Company), they offer to their visitors, better search services around drill-down and attribute search.

This technology is based on Artificial Intelligence Engine and works on the principle of Machine-Learning

See the press release.
http://sourcewire.com/releases/rel_display.php?relid=22499&amp;hilite=]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For information, Yahoo!  Shopping already uses our technology of attribute extraction for all its European Sites.</p>
<p>Through Kelkoo (Yahoo!  Company), they offer to their visitors, better search services around drill-down and attribute search.</p>
<p>This technology is based on Artificial Intelligence Engine and works on the principle of Machine-Learning</p>
<p>See the press release.<br />
<a href="http://sourcewire.com/releases/rel_display.php?relid=22499&#038;hilite=" rel="nofollow">http://sourcewire.com/releases/rel_display.php?relid=22499&#038;hilite=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

