<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Froogle Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Froogle &#171; Google Commerce Guide</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Froogle &#171; Google Commerce Guide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-2317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was critical of Froogle and Google Base back in December of 2005, writing a series of posts: Froogle Spam, Froogle Leftover Spam, and Cleaning up Froogle &#8211; One Post at a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was critical of Froogle and Google Base back in December of 2005, writing a series of posts: Froogle Spam, Froogle Leftover Spam, and Cleaning up Froogle &#8211; One Post at a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComparisonEngines.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Cleaning up Froogle - One Post at a Time</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComparisonEngines.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Cleaning up Froogle - One Post at a Time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ut I&#8217;m not - and please note that there are no AdSense or YPN ads on my site).  When I wrote about Froogle&#8217;s spam problem on December 4, the search results for an iPod nano were so bad [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ut I&#8217;m not &#8211; and please note that there are no AdSense or YPN ads on my site).  When I wrote about Froogle&#8217;s spam problem on December 4, the search results for an iPod nano were so bad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComparisonEngines.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Froogle - Leftover Spam</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComparisonEngines.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Froogle - Leftover Spam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] appy to see Froogle taking baby steps to cut down on spam.  My main example the other day, a search for &#8216;ipod mini&#8217;, returned 225 prices, the first 90+ of which were crap.  Do the same [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appy to see Froogle taking baby steps to cut down on spam.  My main example the other day, a search for &#8216;ipod mini&#8217;, returned 225 prices, the first 90+ of which were crap.  Do the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Smith</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sharon,

When I talk to merchants who are listed exclusively on Froogle, they say itâ€™s because Froogle is free and as a small business, they canâ€™t afford to list on the other comparison engines. BUT small businesses arenâ€™t always the most savvy of marketersâ€¦if they are selling products online at a profit, most likely they could afford a per click fee on a major comparison shopping site and at the very least, they should test out marketing on NexTag, Y! Shopping, PriceGrabber, Shopzilla, and Shopping.com.
-b]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon,</p>
<p>When I talk to merchants who are listed exclusively on Froogle, they say itâ€™s because Froogle is free and as a small business, they canâ€™t afford to list on the other comparison engines. BUT small businesses arenâ€™t always the most savvy of marketersâ€¦if they are selling products online at a profit, most likely they could afford a per click fee on a major comparison shopping site and at the very least, they should test out marketing on NexTag, Y! Shopping, PriceGrabber, Shopzilla, and Shopping.com.<br />
-b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Froogle seems designed to work well for a very small business (i.e., shoestring budget), with products or even unique ones.

That said, I DO WISH that someone would figure out how to stifle the  ads that seem to appear everywhere, not just in Froogle. Was doing research on the African practice of infindibulation (female circumsion) recently and quickly discovered that it&#039;s widely available at e-bay. Go figure!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Froogle seems designed to work well for a very small business (i.e., shoestring budget), with products or even unique ones.</p>
<p>That said, I DO WISH that someone would figure out how to stifle the  ads that seem to appear everywhere, not just in Froogle. Was doing research on the African practice of infindibulation (female circumsion) recently and quickly discovered that it&#8217;s widely available at e-bay. Go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable*</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mashable*]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Abuser-Generated Content - Froogle Getting Spammed&lt;/strong&gt;


	Last month I mentioned that Google Base was full of spam - and to be fair, Google has made genuine efforts to remove some of the junk.  But now Comparison Engines is reporting that Froogle, Google&#8217;s shopping comparison engine, has the same pro...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abuser-Generated Content &#8211; Froogle Getting Spammed</strong></p>
<p>	Last month I mentioned that Google Base was full of spam &#8211; and to be fair, Google has made genuine efforts to remove some of the junk.  But now Comparison Engines is reporting that Froogle, Google&#8217;s shopping comparison engine, has the same pro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian -

I hope you don&#039;t get &quot;CNETTED&quot; because this blog is spot on. Too many Google apologists aren&#039;t willing to point out the plain truth -- Google USED to be the best way to find things online, but by no means is that the case today. Good vertical engines beat Google on many fronts and from a general search perspective, they have lost a step IMHO.

While Froogle can be ROI positive given the cost (free), there is a time cost to set up and optimize listings. As you point out, it may be better spent optimizing comparison engines that provide real value to their end users.

For the end user, I would look elsewhere unless you want to spend time clicking around eBay affiliate sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian -</p>
<p>I hope you don&#8217;t get &#8220;CNETTED&#8221; because this blog is spot on. Too many Google apologists aren&#8217;t willing to point out the plain truth &#8212; Google USED to be the best way to find things online, but by no means is that the case today. Good vertical engines beat Google on many fronts and from a general search perspective, they have lost a step IMHO.</p>
<p>While Froogle can be ROI positive given the cost (free), there is a time cost to set up and optimize listings. As you point out, it may be better spent optimizing comparison engines that provide real value to their end users.</p>
<p>For the end user, I would look elsewhere unless you want to spend time clicking around eBay affiliate sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Journal &#187; Google Froogle and Christmas Spam</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Search Engine Journal &#187; Google Froogle and Christmas Spam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] d) ebay affiliate listings.&#8221; 	For the complete Froogle overview, I suggest reviewing Froogle Spam on Comparison Engines.  	 	 	Posted by &#8212; Loren Baker, Editor @ 11:44 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] d) ebay affiliate listings.&#8221; 	For the complete Froogle overview, I suggest reviewing Froogle Spam on Comparison Engines.  	</p>
<p> 	Posted by &#8212; Loren Baker, Editor @ 11:44 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean O'Rourke</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean O'Rourke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shenanigans are not limited to fake-merchants.

Q: Out of stock for an item?
A: Lower its price on Froogle.
(psst... you might also be interested in these -related- products...)

These clicks are worth less, but not worthless. They might not justify the &quot;old switcheroo&quot; on paid engines, but nothing is ROI negative on Froogle.

But to give Froogle its due, it got a helluva lot better in the last month. To be sure, I would NOT use Froogle for popular searches where other engines have plenty of offers, plenty of structure. Yet on many products, Froogle has zero competition.

For example, I was researching high-end server products, and most shopping engines are lucky to have a related category, much less the specific product, much less a decent selection. In a few cases, Froogle gave a nearly complete &quot;lay of the land&quot; on very niche $,$$$ products.

IMHO, Froogle has become an essential tool in the shopping tool belt, but it should be used sparingly and carefully.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shenanigans are not limited to fake-merchants.</p>
<p>Q: Out of stock for an item?<br />
A: Lower its price on Froogle.<br />
(psst&#8230; you might also be interested in these -related- products&#8230;)</p>
<p>These clicks are worth less, but not worthless. They might not justify the &#8220;old switcheroo&#8221; on paid engines, but nothing is ROI negative on Froogle.</p>
<p>But to give Froogle its due, it got a helluva lot better in the last month. To be sure, I would NOT use Froogle for popular searches where other engines have plenty of offers, plenty of structure. Yet on many products, Froogle has zero competition.</p>
<p>For example, I was researching high-end server products, and most shopping engines are lucky to have a related category, much less the specific product, much less a decent selection. In a few cases, Froogle gave a nearly complete &#8220;lay of the land&#8221; on very niche $,$$$ products.</p>
<p>IMHO, Froogle has become an essential tool in the shopping tool belt, but it should be used sparingly and carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Man Who Invented the Internet</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/04/froogle-spam/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Man Who Invented the Internet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=246#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;UnGoogling Things&lt;/strong&gt;

ComparisonEngines.com points out a problem with Froogle:Froogle has a problem, and I assume Google Base will have the same problem. Because there are no setup fees and no per click fees, the results on Froogle are often made up of]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UnGoogling Things</strong></p>
<p>ComparisonEngines.com points out a problem with Froogle:Froogle has a problem, and I assume Google Base will have the same problem. Because there are no setup fees and no per click fees, the results on Froogle are often made up of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

