Comments on: PriceGrabber Deal from an Earnings Perspective http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/14/pricegrabber-deal-from-an-earnings-perspective/ Just another WordPress.com weblog Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:27:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Mike Bernier http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/14/pricegrabber-deal-from-an-earnings-perspective/#comment-319 Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:04:21 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=259#comment-319 Great insight Brian. My guess is that Pricegrabber was sold for the “going rate”, that is for what its “perceived value/value of the future” is today. The way Shopping Seach has exploded over the last year tells the story. If Shopzilla or Shopping.com would have held out its sale until after the PriceGrabber sale, you might see a number near a billion. I wonder when and at what price NexTag will go? Heck, with the PG deal, I’m wondering what shop.com, pricerunner, etc are worth.

]]> By: CA_SCOT http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/14/pricegrabber-deal-from-an-earnings-perspective/#comment-318 Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:23:56 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=259#comment-318 Excellent analysis – thanks Brian!

S

]]> By: josh http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/14/pricegrabber-deal-from-an-earnings-perspective/#comment-317 Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:04:38 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=259#comment-317 thanks brian!

]]> By: Vicente C de Baca http://comparisonengines.com/2005/12/14/pricegrabber-deal-from-an-earnings-perspective/#comment-316 Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:58:05 +0000 http://www.comparisonengines.com/?p=259#comment-316 Shopping.com did spend $8-$10 million in 2005 on international expansion, so shopping.com wasn’t as out of line when you factor that in.

(www.shareholder.com/visitors/print_release.cfm?releaseid=158865)

]]>