Yahoo! Adds Shop by Color

September 13, 2007

Before everyone takes this post the wrong way, yes, I was poking fun at how Yahoo! made a big deal out of Shop by Color in a press release, considering that other shopping engines have had this for a while, but I wasn’t poking fun at the actual funtionality. Shopping by color makes shopping fun. And yes, I’m being very serious. At the same time, merchants are horrible at listing all color options in data feeds, so this is a great benefit to them, too. All around, a great addition to Yahoo! Shopping. Shopzilla and Shopping.com, engines that have to pay for their traffic, should be adding features like this to make the user experience more attractive. Yes, they will still have to pay the gatekeeper (Google) for the initial click, but anything these shopping engines can do to convince users to come back directly the next time is worth it.

15 months after Shopwiki launched Shop by Color
11 months after Become launched Shop by Color
10 months after Smarter launched Shop by Color
9 months after TheFind launched Shop by Color

Yahoo! launches Shop by Color as a result of an internal coding competition.

yahoo shopping by color


Shop.org Annual Summit

September 12, 2007

I’ll be at Shop.org next week in Vegas in case anyone wants to get together.

On Tuesday @ 4:45pm, I’ll be leading one of the Roundtable discussions – merchandising on the shopping engines.

On Wednesday @ 3pm, I’ll be presenting with Nathan Decker of Evogear on Data Feed Optimization (DFO) tactics.

Look forward to seeing everyone!


ComparisonEngines.com Redesign

September 12, 2007

You’ll start to see common plugins filter into ComparisonEngines.com over the next month and then a clean up of the site design. The new design will still direct your attention to the content, but hopefully also add a better sense of community, highlighting recent comments and allowing readers to ‘interact’ with the site a bit more.

If anyone has any suggestions for the redesign, please let me know. Thanks!


Vdeep goes Limp

September 12, 2007

So Vdeep is indeed dead. The UK based adult shopping comparison engine closed its doors as the founders couldn’t find financing. I wasn’t watching the progress of Vdeep that closely so I don’t know exactly what happened, but maybe Adrian or Ben will elaborate. While I know I read an article lately about how Sand Hill Road was being more open minded with adult oriented deals, I have a feeling that sites like Vdeep make major investors a little too uncomfortable, even in the light of companies like Adult Friend Finder laughing all the way to the bank (again and again and again).

One suggestion for the shopping engines out there that have adult oriented content: Contact Adrian and Ben. I think the site was getting some traffic. You might has well take over the site on the cheap and monetize that traffic. Siva, Larisa, and Dave, are you listening?!? I know Glimpse.com might be considered a little more fashionable than Vdeep, but maybe it’s worth a shot!


Reviewed.com Lands Washington Post Deal

September 12, 2007

Taking a page from her good friends at PriceGrabber, Robin Liss, CEO of Reviewed.com, has landed a deal with WashingtonPost.com.

Reviewed.com on WashingtonPost.com

You’ve gotta smile when you see that. PriceGrabber is the clear leader in the syndication space (not talking about small API calls, but high quality partners), stealing USAToday and CNET from Shopping.com. Reviewed.com has been a long time PriceGrabber partner and clearly understands the way syndication deals should work.

Robin and her team have been out there busting their butts creating incredibly high quality content for years. I’m sure this deal is just the first in a long line of partnerships to be announced.

As for the terms of the deal, Robin didn’t elaborate, but I’m sure it’s an ad sharing model at least part of the deal is based on ad sharing. High quality reviews from Reviewed.com will increase page views on WashingtonPost.com and Reviewed.com will take a percentage of that ‘found’ revenue.

This is extremely similar to the Zvents model (for full disclosure: Ethan Stock, CEO of Zvents and a partner at NetService Ventures is an investor in SingleFeed). Zvents ‘powers’ the events sections of online newspapers. Check out examples like Boston.com and San Jose Mercury News. Zvents increases page views by syndicating it’s incredible wealth of local event information.

You’ll continue to see lots of companies doing deals like this. It’s nothing new. As print publications continue to struggle, online divisions are more and more willing to strike deals to increase page views. If you want to follow this space, check out Greg Sterling’s blog.


Is Vdeep Gone?

September 9, 2007

I wrote about vdeep, an adult shopping comparison engine, back in 2005. Someone just commented that they can’t get to the site. I can’t get there either and my email to Adrian Yearwood, the co-founder, just bounced. I’ll hopefully have more to report soon.


Thoughts on Jellyfish – It’s All About The Smack

September 9, 2007

Two months ago I wrote a post looking for comments on social shopping. I mentioned Jellyfish. And the Smack attacked (check out the comments for the post). A Smack, for the uninitiated, is a group of jellyfish…or in this case, the fanatical Jellyfish.com Smack Shopping community. Jellyfish has done an incredible job of bringing the fun back into a shopping site.

Smack Shopping is a game: “During each Smack show, Jellyfish auctions off new products in our unique price dropping format. Every second that ticks off the clock, we drop the price of the product, until the deal sells out. And to make it fun, we don’t tell the audience how many units are available for each auction. That’s right, the deal will get better every second you wait, but don’t wait too long because once the product is gone, the deal is over.” (from the Smack Shopping site)

Smack shopping

But the game doesn’t end there. Early on when the price starts dropping, members can guess the % off for the final deal. If you’re the best guesser you get ‘guru points’ (which according to one Smack Shopper do nothing but give you bragging rights – which is actually perfect – Jellyfish can talk smack as well as be part of a smack) and you get to spin the SmackWheel for small prizes like T-Shirts or larger prizes like cash back rewards on Jellyfish.

smack shopping

smack shopping

But the game doesn’t end there. For selected Smack Shows, there’s also sometimes an ‘outwit the smack‘ game where one lucky contestant tries to guess the least popular answer the rest of the smack will pick (hard to explain…gotta see it in action).

smack shopping outwit

But the game doesn’t end there. You can earn Quest points for sending a message to your friends and getting them to sign up. Once Jellyfish hits its Quest goal, there’s a special event. This past week, the second Quest event was a Smack Shopping show featuring a 2007 Toyota Prius (see screen shots throughout this post). To participate in the auction, members had to have received at least 50 quest points.

I think the Smack Shopping experience is really really smart. Jellyfish has remained true to its word of not playing the arbitrage game, while developing a unique customer acquisition channel.

But is the Smack show a customer acquisition channel for the Smack show or for Jellyfish? That’s what’s not yet clear in my mind. And because of the seeming success of Smack Shopping and the incredible hype around social networking, part of me really just wants the company to focus on that area and forget about the comparison shopping angle. In fact, I think it would be smart for one of the main shopping comparison engines to buy Jellyfish for Smack Shopping.

The guys at Jellyfish see Smack Shopping and comparison shopping tightly intertwined. As co-founder MarkMcGuire explained to me, people come in through Smack and convert into Jellyfish.com users. The more users Jellyfish sends to its merchants, the more those merchants will ‘bid up’ (by increasing their cash back amount) their listings. It’s a win-win-win (for consumers, for merchants, and for Jellyfish). Here’s what Mark told me back in July:

“Most of our customers are introduced to Jellyfish through Smack Shopping, and we are extremely pleased with the synergies between the two products. Approximately 35% of our Smack customers are currently converting to Jellyfish.com purchases, and we think this conversion rate will continue to increase. I know you understand the VPA advertising platform at Jellyfish.com allows our merchants to increase their CPA commissions on a global, category and product-level, there-by improving their rankings in our results and their overall value proposition to the end consumer. To realize the full promise of the Jellyfish.com VPA ad model, we need lots of customers buying. Buying drives liquidity in our advertising rates. The more sales retailers receive at Jellyfish.com, the more focus they give to their rankings, not only increasing our advertising revenue, but the actual end deal the customer receives and our overall value proposition. Smack Shopping is a primary means through which this virtuous cycle has started at Jellyfish.com.”

While Jellyfish claims a good % of Smack Shoppers are converting into Jellyfish.com buyers, I just have not found evidence of this. I have talked to many merchants currently on Jellyfish and they are not seeing sales. They say participating in a Smack Show is good, but in general, they are not seeing sales through Jellyfish.com. SingleFeed does not currently support Jellyfish. We will eventually because it’s easy enough to do and merchants are asking us to. However, my position as the SingleFeed guy from the start has been to optimize the listings that are driving the traffic and then worry about the next tier of shopping engines. Just as in the old days of PPC marketing, eventually I didn’t work with Ah-ha, Sprinks, FindWhat, Looksmart, etc. because concentrating on Google and Yahoo was a much better use of my time.

People might argue that because Jellyfish is a cost per acquisition (CPA) model, it doesn’t matter if a merchants doesn’t get sales. That’s a good point, but we all know that there’s always some management involved when working with any marketing channel.

So, as with all my posts, I’m sure you’re asking where I’m going with this. Let me tell you.

Jellyfish has found a creative niche for itself. They really are building a community. Not a shopping community, but a community around a game. Just as people get together to watch Amazing Race or Survivor, Jellyfish members get together for Smack Shopping shows, which turn into Smack parties. That in itself says a lot. It’s not like I’ve talked about shopping on NexTag as a party anytime recently.

Which is why I think the opportunity is not to try to convert the Smack into Jellyfish.com users, but rather completely blow out the social game show piece of the business. Game shows can be incredibly lucrative advertising platforms. Ad markets like the one we have today make this opportunity especially attractive.

The Jellyfish comparison shopping piece is just a distraction. Jellyfish should partner with a major shopping engine or affiliate network for the comparison shopping piece and work exclusively on the game show. OR, some smart shopping engine should swoop in and buy Jellyfish. From the point of view of the major engines, Jellyfish, while not exactly a major force to be reckoned with, has done a good job of acquiring users building an audience without playing the arbitrage game.

Yes, the shopping engine would have to dig into the numbers to see what’s really happening behind the scenes, but numbers (in terms of comparison shopping revenue) aren’t all that matter. Jellyfish has come up with a creative community experience. The Smack isn’t going to come and sting the big boys in the behind, but the big boys need to pay attention to these types of innovations. AND perhaps more importantly, most of the shopping engines make 30% or more of their money from Google AdSense and graphical ads. A site like Shopzilla or PriceGrabber could use Smack Shopping to create deeper advertising relationships with its merchants.


Quechup SPAM

September 7, 2007

If you get an email from me about a social network called Quechup. STAY AWAY. It’s SPAM. Sorry – really sorry. Only second time in 12 years I’ve fallen for something so slimy. Grrrr. These guys should be shut down immediately.


Impending Ecommerce Doom

September 4, 2007

[It's going to take me a while to get my rhythm back. Bear with me. Thanks.]

The holiday shopping season is upon us meaning many analysts will start predicting big or small sales based on year over year numbers (provided by NetRatings, ComScore, Hitwise, etc.) for the ecommerce group.

Three predictions for you:
1. We’ll see year over year growth, but not as strong as we’ve seen in past years.
2. Because year over year growth won’t be as strong as last year, everyone will completely freak out, with headlines from reporters fueling the fire by saying the end of ecommerce is near.
3. Despite the pending DOOM, traffic to the shopping engines will be well above average and merchants using the shopping engines will continue to do well despite another round of increased click costs.

Ok, to my first two points, we’ll see some growth, but not as strong as we’ve seen before. Believe it or not, the ecommerce industry is maturing. Take me, for example. I’ve been buying online since the summer of 1996 (my first purchase was a t-shirt for the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta). Not surprisingly, once I got over my initial fear that 10,000 people were going to steal my credit card, I bought more and more. At some point, I even started purchasing higher ticket items.

Amazingly enough, after 11 years of buying online, I’m no longer growing the number of purchases or buying higher and higher ticket items. I have a feeling a lot of people have gotten to this level. That’s not to say that the total pie of ecommerce transactions can’t increase – there are still people in the US just getting online or fairly new to the online buying world and some new technologies and functionalities will spur online buying. There are more reasons for growth, but let’s just keep it simple right now. I’m just saying that the days of 100% year over year growth are gone. So are the days of 20-25% year over year growth. We’re probably in the days of 8-20% year over year growth for medium sized retailers and probably less for large retailers.

At this point, merchants are tweaking little things to pump through a 0.25% increase in conversion. Don’t get me wrong, that 0.25% increase can add up to a lot of $$$, but it’s not like we’re going to see merchants suddenly jump from 1-3% conversion to 11-13% conversion. People use the web to window shop and to research. I know, who woulda thunk it?!?

Ok, I’m dumbing things down even for me, so let’s bring the conversation up a little. Merchants are doing smart things like moving to more stable and sophisticated ecommerce platforms. With an upgrade to Mercado or Mercent, for example, merchants are no longer just thinking about optimizing, but actually implementing smart, mertrics oriented tests. Merchants are also learning more about their customers to more effectively market to them. This is all good.

Yes, the ecommerce pie will grow. Just not at the rates we’ve seen before.

So what about the shopping engines? My third prediction is that the shopping engines will continue to outpace the industry, showing good, and in some cases, even great year over year traffic growth. Why? Because for as much as everyone rails on the industry for playing a dumb game of arbitrage, the shopping engines really do add value. They are not perfect, but they take product listings, organize them to some degree, and present the user with better information than they could get through a normal Google search. That matters. That’s what being a vertical search engine is all about – using your expertise about a certain vertical to provide valuable information to an end user.

What’s really going to be telling is how the top sites do:
-Shopzilla has admitted (multiple times now) having trouble with rising click costs on the main search engines. This will only get tougher as holiday shopping intensifies. Will the Scripps Network come to Shopzilla’s aid? Will a last minute redesign and newfound focus on a better user experience spur loyalty? It’s going to be a tough battle for Shopzilla to ‘win’ Q4 2007. But as you look at year over year (y/y) numbers, remember that traffic isn’t the only thing that matters.
-Shopping.com is stuck in eBay hell. They’ll continue to plow ahead like all good management consultants, but I get the feeling that this might be the year merchants have enough tracking tools in place to really dig into conversion numbers deep enough to realize that all clicks aren’t created equal. I absolutely hate the lack of transparency of Shopping.com’s partner network. And the fact that Shopping.com is trying to sign up merchants on a CPA basis just solidifies my opinion that overall conversion rates stink. While this will have a long term effect on the ability to work with merchants, the short term impact to Shopping.com will be minimal as the company probably makes over 55% of its revenue from banner ads and Google Adsense ads. In other words, milk the merchants for all they’re worth and sign up lots of graphical advertisements advertisers.
-Yahoo! Shopping isn’t going to get much love in the midst of the company’s restructuring.
-PriceGrabber will knock everyone’s socks off.
-Google Base/Google Product Search will stun even me as product search results are rolled out as Universal search results
-NexTag will continue to be a cash cow, playing the arbitrage game better than almost anyone out there.

Expect me to dig to find out why the shopping engines are growing and if that growth means anything. Remember, anyone can buy traffic, but what matters to merchants is if that traffic converts into buyers.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 163 other followers