<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shopping.com &#8211; Tales from the Absurd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shopping.com - There are always two sides to a story &#124; ComparisonEngines.com</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shopping.com - There are always two sides to a story &#124; ComparisonEngines.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 00:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/new/?p=781#comment-1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As I said last Friday, Shopping.com is no longer not accepting new merchants until January 1, 2008. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I said last Friday, Shopping.com is no longer not accepting new merchants until January 1, 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordanblum</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jordanblum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/new/?p=781#comment-1093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shopping.com had a known bug in their system with Yahoo stores that went ignored for months and cost one of my customers a ton of cash. Instead of displaying the Sale Price, Shopping displayed the Regular Price. I emailed them three times and on the third attempt finally got an email back telling me they were working on it. I asked for a credit, they ignored my requests. Their service stinks and the quality of their traffic is even worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shopping.com had a known bug in their system with Yahoo stores that went ignored for months and cost one of my customers a ton of cash. Instead of displaying the Sale Price, Shopping displayed the Regular Price. I emailed them three times and on the third attempt finally got an email back telling me they were working on it. I asked for a credit, they ignored my requests. Their service stinks and the quality of their traffic is even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search_junkie</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[search_junkie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/new/?p=781#comment-1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got it! I just realized WTF is up with SDC. I can’t believe that I did not realize this earlier! SDC is own3d by eBay right, so maybe eBay is trying to build the worst CSE ever so that more shoppers will use eBay. Damn, I am so good sometimes that I scare myself. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraMandzok</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LauraMandzok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/new/?p=781#comment-1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that I’m pretty new to the Comparison Shopping Engine industry, having come from the world of PPC.</p>
<p>With that said, the level of service &#8211; in all respects &#8211; I’ve received from Shopping.com has been absurd.</p>
<p>Reporting is definately subpar and there have been many instances in which my support inquiries have just been flat out ignored.</p>
<p>I am not surprised that this badly mis-managed company can’t handle new business. It’s really a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://comparisonengines.com/2007/11/09/shoppingcom-tales-from-the-absurd/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comparisonengines.com/new/?p=781#comment-1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m on the other side of the coin, a publisher with accounts at most of the comparison shopping engines. I don’t think shopping.com wants publishers either. In the past few months I’ve completely stopped using The shopping.com program for one simple reason… Their product database is a mess in my sector. New products that are widely available from most of the major chains take months to appear, duplicate productIDs for the same product/SKU that segment the store offers, and store offers that get misaligned with the wrong product ID.</p>
<p>As a result I’ve almost stopped using their API in favor of shopzilla.com. The fastest response time I ever got from a support question from shopping.com was 5 days. Problems that I reported with productIDs were almost never fixed. With shopzilla I typically hear back within 2 hours. While their product database isn’t perfect, they make the necessary changes fast and have fewer errors to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

