The Sears Marketplace Screw Up

Sears Marketplace recently formerly announced the launch of its marketplace. Overnight, Sears Marketplace had 10m items available from over 1500 sellers, according to the website.

When I saw the number, I knew that they didn’t yet have 1500 direct seller relationships, but rather syndicated content from one or more shopping engines like Shopping.com. And I didn’t give it much more thought. That was a mistake.

While syndication deals are the norm for many shopping engines, syndicating product offerings to CNET is much different from syndicating product offerings to a brand name retail site like Sears.com. And this is where the shit hit the fan. Large retailers with big brand names suddenly found themselves on a site (Sears.com) and had no idea how it happened.

This has been a long time problem in the industry as the major shopping engines don’t publish a list of their partners. I’ve been pushing for this transparency for a long time. The partner networks should be run similar to Google’s content network so merchants have visibility into click-through rates, conversion rates, and ROI/ROAS/CPA by partner and the ability to optimize which partners get which offers. But in general, while merchants have complained to the shopping engines about this lack of transparency, there’s been no bite to the bark. Until now.

As stated in this post by PM Digital:

The Sears Marketplace situation is new territory and a game changer. It can no longer be business as usual with CSEs and blind networks unless they make substantial changes to their I/Os that address the major issues and risks.

We saw many upscale brands running on Sears Marketplace yesterday. They are slowly coming down.

It’s hard to believe that the various players involved with the Sears launch underestimated how other brands would feel. But even more unsettling is how some folks thought they could bypass the types of discussions strategic partners must always have to collaborate and cooperate for a mutually agreeable outcome.

Since the news broke, not only have merchants asked to be pulled from Sears Marketplace, but they’re also forcing the shopping engines to disclose their partner networks. This is a great step forward for the industry, and I strongly encourage the shopping engines to be extremely transparent. If they don’t offer visibility, they will lose the big name, big brand merchants. If they do offer visibility, they have the opportunity to establish a strong trust and partnership with retailers, which has been missing from this industry.

Yes, it might be painful because the shopping engines could have a lot of not so ‘clean’ partners, but the alternative is that they loose the majority of smart IR 500 retailers. And if that happens, they don’t have a good consumer offering and will not succeed. Are you going to visit a comparison shopping engine which doesn’t list Best Buy, Williams Sonoma, Macy’s, and Bloomingdale’s? Probably not. Especially when it’s so easy to just start your search on Google and be directed to Google Shopping, which will list all those retailers.


Greg Goodson said

You hit the nail on the head.

We had some big brands come to us and say “how the heck did we get on Shop.com? Take us down immediately”. Not only that, the delay to get these brands off of Sears.com took such a long time, I had to filter out these brands from our syndicated partner that we wound up losing some revenue from those engines until we were sure that all items were off Sears.

It may have been a good partnership between Sears and the CSEs they had joined forces with, but not nearly enough thought went into it. It’s amazing that engines like PriceGrabber and Shopping.com won’t give us a list of their syndicated partners… it’s probably because these engines know that once we see the list, we’ll immediately ask to be removed (*cough* click arbitrage *cough*).

– Greg


Colin Murphy said

The shopping engines syndicating their listings without advertiser visibility is a major issue. Through what other channel does an advertiser have no idea where or to whom their ads are displaying? In fact, visibility, track-ability and targeting are three of the main benefits of advertising online. When the shopping engines go the black box route and blindly syndicate advertisers’ listings, they are taking a huge step backwards.

This story is getting lots of play because big names are involved (Sears, Williams Sonoma, etc). However, regular SMB advertisers fall victim to these opaque syndication practices everyday. I even encounter merchants who have signed up with and are submitting their product feed to a particular shopping engine and – instead of publishing those direct listings – the shopping engine publishes syndicated listings that they are getting from another engine. You might ask why the engine would do this. The answer simply is: money. The “publisher engine” gets a percentage of the syndicated listings’ CPC fees (say 70%) and if that is greater than the direct CPC they are getting from the advertiser, they show the syndicated listing instead. Shameful.

This would be like an advertiser developing two full page magazine ads… one for Sports Illustrated (targeted towards young males) and one for Martha Stewart Living (targeted towards middle aged women)… only to find out that Sports Illustrated, instead of publishing the ad that they were given, published an ad that Martha Stewart Living passed along to them… and they didn’t inform the advertiser…. and, well, you can guess what happened to the conversion rate…


nfl sales nfl for sale jersey store said

This would be like an advertiser developing two full page magazine ads… one for Sports Illustrated (targeted towards young males) and one for Martha Stewart Living (targeted towards middle aged women)… only to find out that Sports Illustrated, instead of publishing the ad that they were given, published an ad that Martha Stewart Living passed along to them… and they didn’t inform the advertiser…. and, well, you can guess what happened to the conversion rate…